Agner`s CPU blog

Software optimization resources | E-mail subscription to this blog | www.agner.org

Flat ViewSearchListList MessageboardsHelp
How good is hyperthreading?
Author: Gabe Parmer Date: 2009-11-03 09:14
As defined in Levy's ISCA paper, SMT == hyperthreading.

www.cs.washington.edu/research/smt

and the publication:

"Simultaneous Multithreading: Maximizing On-Chip Parallelism"
with ps link @
www.cs.washington.edu/research/smt/papers/isca95abstract.html

The name SMT might be quite ambiguous now and I agree it probably shouldn't be used. However, for history's sake, it is well-defined, and was good research.

Reply To This MessagePrevious MessageNext Message
 
thread How good is hyperthreading? new - Agner Fog - 2009-09-29
replythread How good is hyperthreading? new - StuffMaster - 2009-10-30
last replythread How good is hyperthreading? new - Agner Fog - 2009-10-30
last replythread How good is hyperthreading? new - Andrew Rodland - 2009-10-31
last replythread How good is hyperthreading? new - Agner Fog - 2009-10-31
last replythread How good is hyperthreading? - Gabe Parmer - 2009-11-03
last reply How good is hyperthreading? new - Agner Fog - 2009-11-03
replythread How good is hyperthreading? new - Fred Bosick - 2009-12-14
last reply How good is hyperthreading? new - Agner Fog - 2009-12-15
reply AMD Bulldozer new - Agner Fog - 2009-12-15
last reply How good is hyperthreading? new - Alain Amiouni - 2010-04-30
 
Flat ViewSearchListList MessageboardsHelp